Hi there!
I’m Elizabeth, and I’m a visual fiend.

I consume visual material at an absurd rate, its what I collect, what inspires me, what I surround myself with everyday. I just really like looking at stuff, and as the proud possessor of 1000 pictures of various rocks & minerals (my best estimate), 500 of clouds, 600 of mountains or skyscrapers, and at least 1500 pictures of various bits of typography, I think my own resources of visual inspiration are beginning to rival even that of the digital cabinet of wonders, Ffffound. Or, if not quite at that point yet, they are at least the best and most eloquent expression of my personality that I could put in front of you. They are also something that I think of as an expression of my creativity, notwithstanding the fact that I didn’t ever create any of this imagery. Something of an articulation-through-collation.
It’s too easy to worry though, that a reliance on outside imagery, on other’s peoples creative visions, shows up a weak spot in my design ability. I get passionate about other peoples work, and try to channel that into what I’m interested in myself.. but maybe I should be having my ideas out of thin air.

Any design in the world is shot through with references, allusions, visual languages, in a huge mess of cultural echoes. It’s not surprising; graphic design, or for that matter any design in my opinion, seems to operate as a sort of visual “fluid”, linking together other cultural products, keeping them circulating, promoting them, challenging them, inspiring them. I read an interesting article by Jonathan Letham, The ecstasy of influence; A plagarism (it’s a long haul, but worth it. I’d reccommend skimming it, if nothing else), the most eye-catching sentence of which was for me; ”most artists are converted to art by art itself.” That is to say, looking at the work of others you admire serves to inspire you to greater heights. “Neurological study has lately shown that memory, imagination, and consciousness itself is stitched, quilted, pastiched. If we cut-and-paste our selves,” Letham goes on to ask, “might we not forgive it of our artworks?” So is digital sampling is an design technique in itself?

The sad side effect to the investment of time and effort that we spend pastiching ourselves up a unique style is the ease by which this style can be adapted by someone else. Which is not such a bad thing, unless your identity as a designer-author is irrevocably linked to that style, allowing your identity to be claimed by anyone who can be bothered.
But we can be better than that. By fearlessly trying out and appraising the more topical aspects of style, we can create an identity that is greater than the sum of the parts of our aesthetics. By skirting a single, driven aesthetic in favor of a more broad-spectrum approach, the bodies of work we create will reveal subtle but pivotal common threads, which will add up to a definite je ne sais quoi that over time will become plain to see.
It’s more so much more fun this way, anyway. Totally.
And, just for you, some of my absolute favourite sources of inspiration & visual silliness;
http://dethjunkie.tumblr.com/
http://supermassiveblackhole.tumblr.com/
http://sojamo.tumblr.com/
http://risingtensions.tumblr.com/
http://synapticstimuli.com/
Recent Comments